"THE CASE FOR GREENLAND"

(“HOW TO GET IT DONE?”)

---

Securing Greenland under the United States would grant President Trump a defining place in history, cementing his legacy as one of America’s most visionary and effective leaders. By orchestrating a respectful and beneficial partnership with Greenland — enriching both its people and U.S. national interests — he could achieve what no other president has in modern times: a peaceful, strategic expansion that bolsters America’s economic and geopolitical standing. History teaches us that successful unions thrive when local populations truly see the benefits. In this regard, Greenland is a once-in-a-century opportunity.

“How to Get it Done?”

Today’s interconnected world requires a respectful, detailed, and patient plan — one that resonates with Greenlanders on every level. History teaches us that successful annexations or unions hinge on winning local hearts and minds through concrete benefits, robust public engagement, and genuine respect for identity and autonomy.

By methodically presenting each Greenlander with tangible ways their daily lives and futures would improve — drawing upon the best lessons from Texas, Hawaii, and beyond — the United States can forge a new, mutually beneficial partnership with Greenland. No grand expansions or acquisitions can succeed without the trust and enthusiastic backing of the local population. Yet, as evidenced throughout America’s history of peaceful unions, state admissions, and modernization drives, the U.S. has the tools, economic might, and diplomatic savvy to make such a bold endeavor not just feasible, but ultimately transformative for both Greenlanders and Americans alike.

Key Historical Precedents and Lessons

Throughout history, successful unions and annexations have been driven by a combination of economic opportunity, cultural persuasion, and strategic necessity. Below are key historical examples that illustrate how regions have integrated into larger nations — either successfully or as cautionary tales of missteps to avoid.

• Unification of Germany (1871) — Otto von Bismarck’s deft political and diplomatic maneuvers demonstrate how building a shared cultural and economic narrative can unify diverse states. Though it involved strategic warfare, Bismarck’s real success lay in persuading multiple German polities of their common destiny.

• Annexation of Texas by the United States (1845) — The idea of “Manifest Destiny” and the promise of economic and security benefits convinced Texans to join the Union. Political campaigns and media promotion played a crucial role in shaping public opinion.

• Hawaiian Annexation by the United States (1898) — American entrepreneurs and pro-annexation campaigns highlighted the benefits of military protection, expanded trade, and integration into a larger economic sphere. Over time, Hawaiians were swayed by these promises, culminating in statehood in 1959.

• Czech and Slovak Federation (1918) — After World War I, Czech nationalists convinced initially reluctant Slovak leaders through promises of autonomy. This case demonstrates how pledges of self-governance and shared prosperity can unite distinct regions peacefully.

• German Reunification (1990) — Following the fall of the Berlin Wall, a combination of political dialogue, intense media campaigns, and strong international support dismantled decades of division between East and West Germany.

These examples illustrate how dialogue, persuasion, promises of infrastructure development, and economic opportunity have historically convinced populations to embrace new national affiliations.

A Door-to-Door, One-on-One Persuasion Effort

In the 21st century, no annexation or unification can succeed purely by decree. It must be a comprehensive, personal campaign reaching every Greenlander. This is both symbolic and practical:

• Symbolic: Demonstrates respect for Greenlandic identity, culture, and individual choice.

• Practical: Builds trust and counters misinformation.

Historic Parallel — Panama Canal

U.S. Army Colonel William C. Gorgas, a physician in the United States Army Medical Corps, is an exemplar. He led a painstaking, door-to-door effort in Panama, checking water containers to eradicate mosquitoes carrying yellow fever. This meticulous approach saved countless lives and cemented trust in the U.S. mission. A similar spirit of thorough, personal outreach — where U.S. officials and volunteers literally visit Greenlandic towns and homes — would showcase genuine care and diligence, building a grassroots foundation of support.

Central Arguments

1. Geopolitical Risks & Strategic Defense
   Greenland’s location makes it a potential pawn in global nuclear strategies, given its proximity to key ballistic missile flight paths between Russia and the United States. In any high-stakes confrontation, Greenland’s airspace could become a conduit or a shield for intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), transforming the island into a possible flashpoint.

   • Potential Pawn: As tensions rise between nuclear powers, Greenland risks being used as a bargaining chip or subjected to covert operations aimed at controlling its territory or infrastructure.

   • Arctic Militarization: Russia’s expanding footprint in the Arctic and China’s growing global ambitions underscore Greenland’s rising strategic value.

   • Alliance Benefits: Full integration with America offers NATO-level protection and the backing of a global superpower, reducing the chance that Greenland becomes a vulnerable bargaining chip.

Crucial Analogy — Ukraine’s Dilemma

Consider Ukraine, lying directly in the path of Russia’s historical security concerns after enduring two major invasions, and simultaneously facing NATO’s post–World War II apprehensions. This stark geographic squeeze shows how quickly a nation can become a flashpoint between rival powers. The same scenario could unfold in Greenland if major powers see it as strategically indispensable. By preemptively aligning with a democratic heavyweight, Greenland can avoid the fate of being caught unprepared in a future geopolitical crossfire.

1. The Strengths of American Democracy: A Preemptive Choice
   When comparing potential alliances, the distinction between the U.S.’s democratic framework and the more authoritarian approaches of other powers is stark. In a world where any great power might eventually vie for Greenland’s territory — either openly or indirectly — joining a democracy can be a proactive safeguard against autocratic or totalitarian influence.

1. Guaranteed Liberties: Freedom of speech, rule of law, protection of minority rights.

2. Innovation Ecosystem: Democracies, particularly the U.S., encourage creativity, problem-solving, and entrepreneurship — driving robust economic growth.

3. Transparent Governance: Checks and balances reduce corruption, offering stability and clearer channels for Greenland to influence policy at the national level.

4. Preemptive Security & Mutual Benefit: Aligning with a stable democracy ensures Greenlanders maintain agency over their future, rather than being subject to opaque decision-making or top-down dictates.

1. Unparalleled Economic & Educational Advantages
   3.1 Largest Economy in the World
   Greenland’s potential union with the U.S. grants immediate exposure to a $25+ trillion GDP economy:

1. Wall Street Access: Deep capital markets for fundraising and infrastructure projects.

2. Venture Capital & Private Equity: Silicon Valley’s engine can supercharge local startups, from fisheries and tourism to data centers and green tech.

3.2 The World’s Premier University System

1. Ivy League & Beyond: Harvard, Yale, MIT, Stanford — offering Greenlanders a direct route to world-class education.

2. Tech & Research Partnerships: Specialized programs integrating Arctic studies, climate research, and engineering solutions.

3.3 Global Corporations & Brands

1. Powerhouse of Brands: Apple, Google, Amazon, Boeing — massive R&D budgets and global reach.

2. Partnership for Prosperity: Greenland can attract corporate investments in infrastructure, tourism, IT, and green energy — creating jobs and diversified income streams.

1. Massive Public & Private Investments
   4.1 Infrastructure Overhaul

1. Highways, Airports, Ports, Tunnels, Utilities: Modernizing Greenland’s transport grid to boost trade and connectivity.

2. Renewable Energy Projects: Hydroelectric, wind, and possibly geothermal, reducing fuel imports and carbon footprints.

4.2 Data Centers & Tech Hubs

1. Ideal Climate for Cooling: Lower operating costs for server farms.

2. Green-Tech Innovation: Collaborations with tech giants to establish next-generation IT infrastructure.

4.3 Tourism Industry

1. Eco-Tourism & Polar Adventures: Joint ventures with major hotel chains and cruise lines.

2. Cultural Tourism: Highlighting Inuit heritage, festivals, and unique culinary experiences.

1. Cultural Preservation & Local Autonomy
   Respecting Greenland’s identity is paramount:

1. Door-to-Door Persuasion: A symbolic, powerful outreach effort honoring each citizen’s perspective.

2. Language & Arts: Grants to promote Greenlandic language, media, and cultural festivals.

3. Self-Governance: Authority to shape local laws, maintain indigenous traditions, and protect Greenland’s social fabric.

1. Sister Cities & Societal Exchanges
   A people-focused approach extends beyond politics:

1. Universities & High Schools: Student exchanges, shared curricula, cultural immersion.

2. Civil Services: Collaboration among police, firefighters, healthcare professionals.

3. Community Hubs: Libraries, cultural centers, and sports facilities twinned with American counterparts.

1. Holistic Healthcare & Well-Being

1. Advanced Medical Facilities: Modern hospitals and telemedicine for remote regions.

2. Preventive Care & Research: Partnerships with the CDC and NIH addressing unique Arctic health challenges.

3. Insurance & Social Security: Integrating Greenlanders into America’s extensive social safety net.

1. Tangible Improvements to Everyday Life
   Greenlanders are rightly proud and well-educated, asking: “How does joining the U.S. benefit me?” The answer must be practical and inclusive:

1. Higher Incomes & Job Creation

2. Infrastructure Boom: New highways, airports, utilities, healthcare facilities.

3. Market Access: A 330+ million-strong consumer market.

4. Social Safety Net: Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, plus federal emergency support.

5. Quality Education & Retirement: In-state tuition, pension programs, and retirement schemes matching existing U.S. states.

A Comprehensive Master Plan: Public & Private Investment

1. Massive Public Investment
   The U.S. can deploy large-scale, long-term financing:

   • Energy & Telecommunications: Modernize grids, bring high-speed internet to remote regions.

   • Healthcare & Education: Build state-of-the-art medical facilities and support Greenlandic universities and vocational schools.

1. Targeted Private Capital

1. Venture Capital & Private Equity: Seed funding for Greenlandic startups in software, Arctic tech, renewable energy, and logistics.

2. U.S. Corporate Investments: Data centers, responsible mineral extraction, tourism partnerships.

1. A One-Time Payout for Every Greenlander
   A significant, one-time financial payout to every resident — akin to Alaska’s oil dividend model — underscoring the U.S. commitment and offering immediate benefits.

2. Equal Status as Any Other U.S. State

1. Representation in Congress: Two Senators and at least one voting Representative.

2. Full Electoral Votes: Participation in U.S. Presidential elections.

3. Constitutional Protections: Bill of Rights and federal legal frameworks apply.

1. Guaranteed Minimum Annual Budget & a 30-Year Agreement
   A legally enshrined multi-decade financial commitment to ensure sustained investment and development.

2. Special Income Tax Exempt Status (Like Puerto Rico)
   A transitional period of favorable tax policies, spurring business growth and entrepreneurship.

3. A Merit-Based Seat at the Table

1. Executive Branch Representation: A rotating seat in the President’s Cabinet or special Arctic councils.

2. Key Advisory Roles: Engagement on climate, resource management, and indigenous affairs.

1. Sister Cities & Sister States: A Cultural & Institutional Bridge

1. Education: Joint research programs, student exchanges, cultural immersion.

2. Professional Services: Cross-training among public services, shared resources, and best practices.

3. Community Activities: Youth sports, cultural festivals, volunteer programs.

1. Hawaii’s Special Benefits

1. Tourism Infrastructure: National parks, highways, airports, modeled on Hawaii’s success.

2. Cultural Autonomy: Legal frameworks safeguarding indigenous traditions.

3. Federal Disaster Relief: Critical in the Arctic as climate shifts bring new risks.

1. 10.Puerto Rico’s Free-Associated Model as a Fallback

• Partial Representation: While not full voting rights, still a voice in Congress.

• Autonomy in Governance: Retaining local cultural and legal traditions.

• Potential Path to Statehood: If Greenland’s populace shifts in favor of full union.

1. 11.Autonomy, Representation, & Participation

• Indigenous Rights & Arctic Environment: Embrace local leadership on cultural and climate issues.

• Local Lawmaking: Greenlandic authorities maintain broad legislative powers.

• Collaborative Research & Innovation: Leveraging the Arctic’s global importance.

This two-pronged analysis and proposal— security realities vs. economic promise — underscores how vital it is for Greenland to align with a stable, prosperous democracy. By doing so under President Trump’s proposed vision, Greenlanders would share in a transformative partnership that fortifies Greenland’s sovereignty and amplifies its potential on the global stage. Such a move would echo through history, immortalizing Greenland’s choice and marking President Trump as an architect of a bold, peaceful expansion of American influence — benefiting generations to come.

Greenlandic Perspectives: Aspirations & Realities

1. Deeply Held Desire for Autonomy

   • Evolving Status: Denmark handles external affairs and defense; Greenland oversees legislation, healthcare, and more.

   • Cultural Preservation: Greenlanders’ Inuit heritage, language, and tight-knit communities remain central.

   • Public Sentiment: Polls show 85% of Greenlanders oppose joining any other nation. Many hope to chart a path toward eventual independence.

1. Economic Considerations & Denmark’s Role

1. Fishing Reliance: Over 90% of Greenland’s exports come from fishing.

2. Danish Subsidies: Cover nearly half of Greenland’s public budget.

3. Path to Independence: Leaders seek to diversify tourism and mining to reduce reliance on Denmark.

1. Public Opinion & Self-Determination

1. Poll Data: Only 6% favor joining the U.S.

2. Potential Negotiation: Any referendum would require transparency and feasibility studies with Greenlanders, Danes, and Americans.

3. Cultural & Social Priorities: Preserving heritage, local governance, and community cohesion is paramount.

Bridging the Two Narratives

Respecting Greenland’s Autonomy

• Democratic Processes: Town halls, referendums, and inclusive community consultations.

• Cultural Sensitivity: Safeguarding Greenlandic traditions, language, and social structures.

• Mutual Benefit, Not Imperialism: America’s economic might meets Greenland’s cultural identity on equal terms.

Comprehensive, Door-to-Door Engagement

1. Inclusive Forums: Town halls, workshops, and open debates prioritizing Greenlandic voices.

2. Transparent Communication: Details on subsidies, pensions, resource management, and cultural rights.

3. Shared Decision-Making: Greenlandic leaders co-shaping all final agreements.

Geopolitical Realities vs. Greenland’s Aspirations

• Security Concerns: U.S. defense infrastructure could deter threats but raises sovereignty questions.

• Economic Promise: Large U.S. investments could spur diversification yet must not overshadow local industries or Danish aid.

Feasibility Studies & Mutual Accountability

1. Political Feasibility: Overcoming public opposition through trust-building, referendums, verifiable benefits.

2. Economic Feasibility: Matching or exceeding Danish subsidies for stability.

3. Cultural & Social Feasibility: Protecting Greenlandic language, traditions, and community life.

Toward a Respectful, Future-Focused Dialogue

“The Case for Greenland,” from an American viewpoint, underscores vast economic gains, strategic security, and a potential legacy for President Trump. Yet Greenland’s unique history, cultural pride, and aspiration for self-determination demand careful humility and genuine collaboration.

1. Balancing Risk and Reward: Greenland’s precarious geopolitical position can benefit from American alignment, but only if Greenlanders find it advantageous.

2. Empowering Greenlandic Voices: Overcoming the 85% opposition requires transparent, one-on-one engagement.

3. Co-Authoring Greenland’s Future: Policies, infrastructure plans, and cultural safeguards must be co-created, honoring Greenland’s identity while utilizing U.S. innovation, defense, and economic strengths.

If the United States truly wishes to incorporate Greenland, the process must reflect genuine partnership — an alliance shaped by Greenlanders’ aspirations as much as by American strategic interests. This delicate balance can transform Greenland into a vibrant Arctic hub, secure in its identity yet invigorated by U.S. opportunity. Only through coherent, logical, and culturally aligned dialogue can such a vision find real acceptance, ultimately making history in a manner that resonates for generations to come.

Erasmus Cromwell-Smith
February 26th, 2025.

Author’s Note:

Potential Impact on Crypto Mining in Greenland:

Greenland’s frigid climate and abundant potential for renewable energy mirror many of the advantages seen in places like Iceland—where low ambient temperatures and cost-effective power sources make crypto mining and data center operations far more economical. By reducing the need for air conditioning and leveraging hydro or wind energy, Greenland could dramatically lower operational costs for mining farms. If Greenland deepened its ties with the U.S. (as proposed in the broader article), it would not only gain access to larger pools of investment capital but could also position itself as a major hub for sustainable, low-cost bitcoin infrastructure—potentially driving new waves of tech innovation and job creation in the process.

https://e-cromwellsmith.medium.com/